SSlopdar
27slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once

Is doksli9899.netlify.app built or slop?

Slopdar scanned doksli9899.netlify.app and gave it a Slop Score of 27/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

Default favicon spotted. The website equivalent of an unset profile picture.

Caught on camera
Screenshot of doksli9899.netlify.app
The usual suspects
BootstrapNetlifySupabase

The receipts

4 tells found
01
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
02
Supabase backend+7
Supabase client / project references were found.
Stack tell
03
Hosted on Netlify+5
Netlify hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
04
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 15 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
High em-dash densityclears +10
Rewrite the copy with fewer em dashes. Use periods, commas or a rephrase instead.
02
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.