Is datafa.st built or slop?

Name: Slopdar Slop Score for datafa.st
Item: datafa.st
Rating: 3
Author: Slopdar

Slopdar scanned datafa.st and gave it a Slop Score of 3/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Ugh, fine. A human made this. With their hands. On purpose.”

Scan your own site →

Caught on camera

The usual suspects

BootstrapNext.jsVercel

The receipts

3 tells found

Stock Next.js setup+6

Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.

Default asset

Three-feature-card grid+6

The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.

Layout tell

Hosted on Vercel+6

Vercel hosting headers were present.

Stack tell

Signs a human was here

✓

Real site pages-8

Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.

Human signal

✓

Considered metadata-4

A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.

Human signal

✓

Custom typography-3

Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.

Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.