32slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is d3v.tools built or slop?
Slopdar scanned d3v.tools and gave it a Slop Score of 32/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareGoogle AnalyticsTailwind CSS
The receipts
4 tells found01
Lorem ipsum placeholder text+22
Untouched lorem-ipsum filler text is still on the page.
Leftover junk
02
Placeholder images+8
Stock placeholder image services (placehold.co, via.placeholder).
Leftover junk
03
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
04
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.