24slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
Is cursor.com built or slop?
Slopdar scanned cursor.com and gave it a Slop Score of 24/100 (Hand-Crafted). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Ugh, fine. A human made this. With their hands. On purpose.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsVercel
The receipts
6 tells found01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
03
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
04
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
05
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
06
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-8
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Links to GitHub-5
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.