28slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is codekraftstudio.com built or slop?
Slopdar scanned codekraftstudio.com and gave it a Slop Score of 28/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 5 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Next, Tailwind, shadcn, Vercel. The vibe-code combo meal, no substitutions.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsSupabaseVercel
The receipts
5 tells found01
Classic vibe-coding stack+10
Next.js + Vercel + Supabase together: the default AI-build combo.
Stack tell
02
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
03
Supabase backend+7
Supabase client / project references were found.
Stack tell
04
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
05
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 9 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
Gradient blobs / auroraclears +9
Replace the blurred gradient blob backgrounds with something specific to your brand.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.