47slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is buildhop.io built or slop?
Slopdar scanned buildhop.io and gave it a Slop Score of 47/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 7 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
Next.jsSupabaseVercelWordPress
The receipts
7 tells found01
Untouched shadcn/ui+12
Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.
Default asset
02
Radix UI primitives+10
Radix UI primitives (the shadcn/ui foundation) were detected.
Default asset
03
Classic vibe-coding stack+10
Next.js + Vercel + Supabase together: the default AI-build combo.
Stack tell
04
Supabase backend+7
Supabase client / project references were found.
Stack tell
05
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
06
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
07
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.