SSlopdar
7slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is bruno-simon.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned bruno-simon.com and gave it a Slop Score of 7/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

This is what websites looked like before the great slop flood.

Caught on camera
Screenshot of bruno-simon.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle Analytics

The receipts

2 tells found
01
Default Vite build+8
An untouched Vite build signature was detected.
Default asset
02
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 6 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Images missing alt textclears +6
Add alt text to the images that are missing it.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.