SSlopdar
69slop score / 100
Vibe-Coded

Is bolt.new built or slop?

Slopdar scanned bolt.new and gave it a Slop Score of 69/100 (Vibe-Coded). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

Half artisan, half autocomplete. We can see the seams from here.

Scan your own site →
Caught on camera
Screenshot of bolt.new
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareTailwind CSS

The receipts

6 tells found
01
Built with Bolt+35
StackBlitz Bolt.new build artifacts were detected.
Tool fingerprint
02
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
03
Radix UI primitives+10
Radix UI primitives (the shadcn/ui foundation) were detected.
Default asset
04
Default Vite build+8
An untouched Vite build signature was detected.
Default asset
05
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
06
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.