32slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is biuld.app built or slop?
Slopdar scanned biuld.app and gave it a Slop Score of 32/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel
The receipts
6 tells found01
AI marketing buzzwords+12
Clusters of "elevate / seamless / supercharge"-style filler.
Copy tell
02
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
03
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
04
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
05
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
06
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.