SSlopdar
3slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is arxiv.org built or slop?

Slopdar scanned arxiv.org and gave it a Slop Score of 3/100 (Hand-Crafted). 1 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“You wrote your own CSS. In this economy?”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of arxiv.org
The usual suspects
Astro

The receipts

1 tells found
01
Missing social/meta tags+6
No meta description and no Open Graph tags, a low-effort sign.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 6 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Missing social/meta tagsclears +6
Add a real meta description and Open Graph tags.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.