SSlopdar
48slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean

Is www.aipeekaboo.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned www.aipeekaboo.com and gave it a Slop Score of 48/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 8 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.

Scan your own site →
Caught on camera
Screenshot of www.aipeekaboo.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel

The receipts

8 tells found
01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Untouched shadcn/ui+12
Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.
Default asset
03
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
04
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
05
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
06
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
07
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
08
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
Real site pages-8
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.