SSlopdar
37slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once

Is ai-app-bulider.vercel.app built or slop?

Slopdar scanned ai-app-bulider.vercel.app and gave it a Slop Score of 37/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Still shipping the create-next-app furniture. Vercel says hi.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of ai-app-bulider.vercel.app
The usual suspects
Next.jsVercel

The receipts

4 tells found
01
Default "Create Next App" metadata+24
The page title/description is the untouched Next.js default.
Leftover junk
02
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
03
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
04
Generic page title+5
The page title is a default like "Home" or "Vite App".
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 29 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Default "Create Next App" metadataclears +24
Set a real page title and description in your layout metadata.
02
Generic page titleclears +5
Write a real page title instead of the default.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.