SSlopdar
12slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is adasci.org built or slop?

Slopdar scanned adasci.org and gave it a Slop Score of 12/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Handmade, load-bearing, and rude to our business model.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of adasci.org
The usual suspects
CloudflareGoogle AnalyticsSupabase

The receipts

3 tells found
01
Default Vite build+8
An untouched Vite build signature was detected.
Default asset
02
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
03
Supabase backend+7
Supabase client / project references were found.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 7 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
"Trusted by" logo rowclears +7
Only keep the "Trusted by" row if the logos are real. If they are not, remove it.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.