39slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is transfer.zip built or slop?
Slopdar scanned transfer.zip and gave it a Slop Score of 39/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Default favicon spotted. The website equivalent of an unset profile picture.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsTailwind CSS
The receipts
6 tells found01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
03
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
04
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
05
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
06
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.